Put your company's knowledge to work.
We build knowledge management systems around the terms, relationships and decisions that make your company work. Assess your starting point, build the shared workspace with us, or check how your existing setup serves people and AI.
Start where you need us.
Each service is available independently, with scope agreed around your chosen part of the business.
-
Maturity Assessment
Locate company knowledge, how it is organised, and what people and AI need to use it.
-
Productivity AI Setup and Coaching
Build the shared workspace, connect knowledge to the work, and help your team use and maintain it.
-
Business Analytics
Check whether people can do more with their knowledge, whether work improves, and what needs changing.
Maturity Assessment
Locate company knowledge, how it is organised, and what people and AI need to use it.
With the people who know the business, we follow a real task through its files, systems and decisions. We look at the terms and categories you use, how they relate, which sources are current, and where memory fills the gaps. Together we prioritise what needs structure and how to check whether it helps.
A map of the knowledge behind the task, obstacles, and an agreed starting point for the workspace.
Discuss this serviceProductivity AI Setup and Coaching
Build the shared workspace, connect knowledge to the work, and help your team use and maintain it.
We bring knowledge, know-how, instructions, reusable skills and outputs into one organised tree. Its taxonomy makes clear what belongs where; its ontology explains how things relate. Sources, responsibilities and review points give people and agents the context to act. We build and refine it through real tasks with your team, then coach them to keep it current. Tools may include Claude Code or Codex.
A working knowledge workspace, guidance and reusable skills, with a team equipped to use and maintain them.
Discuss this serviceBusiness Analytics
Check whether people can do more with their knowledge, whether work improves, and what needs changing.
Can an agent find the right source and apply the right rule? Can a colleague check the result and carry the work forward? We compare capability, speed, quality and effects on business decisions against the starting point. The evidence shows where knowledge structure or use needs attention, and what is worth extending across the company.
Evidence of improvements, remaining gaps, and where to invest effort next.
Discuss this serviceMake the knowledge and the instructions readable.
We use the Interpretable Context Methodology (ICM), developed by Jake Van Clief and David McDermott, to keep sources, instructions and review points clear to people and AI. The workspace should let anyone find sources, follow their use, and see where human decisions are needed. Read their paper.
Which part of your company's knowledge needs attention?
Tell us where it lives today and what your team and agents need to do with it.